Showing posts with label Immigrants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Immigrants. Show all posts

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Immigrants - Courier - Connolly Properties: LAC engages lawyers

Published in the Courier News, Sunday, August 31, 2008

Plainfield Hispanic-rights group hires lawyers in immigration suit

By MARK SPIVEY
STAFF WRITER

The Latin American Coalition, a city Hispanic-rights group, has retained attorneys from a prominent New York City-based civil-rights organization in response to a federal lawsuit that has the potential to turn the city into the epicenter of the national debate concerning illegal immigration.

The coalition retained the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, which will work pro bono in opposing the Washington, D.C.,-based Immigration Reform Law Institute, the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform. The institute previously supported anti-illegal immigration ordinances in Riverside and Hazelton, Pa., but both towns were ultimately forced to abandon them. The Defense and Education Fund played a pivotal role in one of those cases, when U.S. District Judge James M. Munley overturned the Hazelton ordinance by ruling it unconstitutional, and Riverside rescinded its ordinance when township officials said the town could not afford the legal costs of defending it.

The lawsuit was filed in June against defendants with Connolly Properties, a locally based real-estate investment and management company that oversees apartments here and in East Orange and Allentown, Pa. The plaintiffs in the case are Maribel DelRio-Mocci, a former leasing agent for Connolly, and two current tenants of Plainfield Connolly Properties, Linda Elliot and Robert Bolmer, who allege that the real-estate group has run and continues to run a scheme to lease rental units to undocumented residents. The plaintiffs contend this is done "through a pattern of encouraging and inducing illegal aliens to reside in the United States and harboring those aliens from official detection in knowing and/or reckless disregard of the fact that such aliens were present in the United States in violation of federal law," according to the language of the suit. Connolly, an official for which declined comment for this story, has until Sept. 15 to file a formal response with the U.S. District Court of New Jersey in Newark.

Setting legal precedent?

The lawsuit is unique in that it ranks among the first ever to cite RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) statutes, which the federal government has traditionally used mostly to fight organized crime, in order to declare Connolly as being tantamount to a criminal-harboring enterprise. The lawsuit also alleges multiple violations of the Fair Housing Act, claiming that Connolly agents deliberately segregate tenants by race and nation of origin in order to reduce the risk of illegal aliens being discovered by authorities.

Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund Executive Director Cesar Perales said the potential ramifications regarding the outcome of the suit are enormous.

"The civil rights implications are very clear, and they go well beyond Plainfield," Perales said. "If this concept that anyone who rents to undocumented people is harboring (criminals) ... and violating federal law, this is going to affect landlords and immigrants all over this country."

Immigration Reform Law Institute Staff Attorney Garrett Roe would not comment extensively on the specifics of the case but agreed that a powerful precedent could be set by its outcome.

"The ideal situation," Roe said, "is that small towns around the country that are dealing with the same problem (of illegal immigration), hopefully they're going to see this,and it will help them deal with such issues."

Along with RICO and Fair Housing Act violations, the lawsuit claims that illegal aliens were "encouraged or allowed to use false identity documents" by Connolly when applying for housing, along with claims that such tenants were not subject to the same maximum occupancy restrictions to which legal citizens were subject. The suit also claims that some legal citizens were falsely informed that no vacancies were available in certain buildings and goes on to cite substandard living conditions existing at some Connolly properties, specifically Plainfield's Central Avenue and Pingry Arms Apartment Complexes.

Tenants say conditions are bad

Two tenants with 25 years of combined residence at Pingry Arms independently claimed some of the allegations in the lawsuit are true, specifically echoing assertions that the demographics have changed and the conditions have deteriorated at the building rapidly since Connolly acquired the property almost directly across from City Hall on Crescent Avenue several years ago.

"They've (Connolly) been getting away with murder," said Troy Moyd, 68, and a resident at Pingry since 1995. "Since they got this place in the last four or five years, the place has been going downhill ever since. They don't believe in fixing anything."

Moyd cited water leaks in his bathroom and ceiling, mouse and roach infestations, and other factors, closely mirroring claims from Bolmer outlined in the lawsuit. Another tenant, who asked only to be identified by his first name, Roger, cited drug dealing and urination in the hallways.

Both men also said they believe Connolly is guilty of deliberately mistreating non-Hispanic tenants in order to homogenize the building by driving other tenants out, even claiming that some phone calls made for maintenance are answered by company employees who claim not to speak English.

However, Clarence McGhie, a retiree who lives in a Central Avenue residence just steps away from the Central Avenue Apartments, said he is not aware of any adverse effects to his neighborhood caused by the nearby Connolly property.

"We're talking about a complex that's maybe one-fifth of a mile from my house, and it's not like I'm ever looking over my shoulder to see who's coming and going," McGhie said. "I've lived here for almost three years and had no problems at all."

McGhie said he isn't sure just what to make of the lawsuit but said he did believe many area immigrants — legal or otherwise — are only looking to improve their lives.

"I don't think it's a black-and-white issue or yes-and-no issue," McGhie said. "But a lot seem to be hard workers who may not be getting a fair deal."

Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs said while she is unaware of the specifics of the lawsuit, she will be keeping an eye on how it unfolds due to its potential to affect the city at large.

"My position, and the position of the city of Plainfield, is that we advocate equal rights for everyone and fair treatment of everyone, regardless of anyone's nationality or ethnic background," Robinson-Briggs said when asked what the city's policy on illegal immigration was. "And we are looking for any and all companies in Plainfield to be fair and equitable to all members of the community."

Company experiences huge growth

The lawsuit further alleges that Connolly was able to achieve much of its financial success — it cites the company as going from overseeing one six-unit building to operating nearly 2,000 units in 45 separate complexes during a 12-year span — due to the existence of the alleged scheme. The plaintiffs contend that Connolly "has been able to acquire extensive real-estate holdings in old and dilapidated apartment buildings, and to operate such holdings as a residential rental enterprise without investing funds correcting the ... dangerous conditions therein."

Connolly oversees at least 27 separate housing entities in Plainfield alone, according to the company's Web site, the vast majority of which are bunched in a narrow corridor spanning Seventh and Ninth streets between Spooner and Richmond avenues. The site includes photos of all 27 properties, advertising rental units ranging from one to three bedrooms and ranging in size from under 350 square feet to more than 1,500 square feet. The site also says Connolly was formed in 1996 "with the intention of making real-estate investment and ownership available to investors who may possess little or no expertise and may have limited capital for investment."

Carl Reed, broker owner for one of the city's most successful property-management firms, ERA Realty on Park Avenue, said he believes Connolly is anything but a criminal enterprise.

"I happen to know the quality of the property he (owner David Connolly) runs and manages, and they are in the top percentage of the properties in this city. He is by no means a slumlord," Reed said. "I would be honored to own some of the properties he owns; he's actually raised the real-estate values in Plainfield. And I believe most of the landlords in town feel the same way."

Reed went on to label the lawsuit as unfairly targeting one property-management company that only is mirroring what countless others do every day.

"I don't know why Connolly was singled out when a majority of landlords in this town probably have a similar situation (in renting to undocumented residents)," Reed said. "In a town that is struggling in an economic downturn, with a population that is such a melting pot, it's unfortunate."

Not all city real-estate officials echoed Reed's words, though. Jeannette Edghill, senior housing administrator for the Plainfield branch of Covenant Manor, a senior citizen apartment complex on East Front Street, said she believes Connolly properties within a block of her building are hotbeds for crime.

"I've had some question marks in my mind about this whole Connolly thing; all of a sudden they're owning all the realty in Plainfield," Edghill said. "Right across the street, there's a lot of drug-dealing going on in there. It's just constant crime."

Flor Gonzalez, director of the Latin American Coalition, said she believes the lawsuit threatens not only tenants of Connolly properties but the city's entire Latino community.

"If this lawsuit is successful, it will result in Latinos being denied the opportunity to obtain housing. It will make many landlords reluctant to rent to Latino tenants ... and have a chilling effect on all landlords," Gonzalez said. "We intend to defend our rights."

Gonzalez also said, in spite of being on the defensive, she was eager to embrace an opportunity to make a statement concerning Hispanic rights that could resound around the country.

"It's time for us to really try and make history," Gonzalez said, "to not allow this to go forward."

Mark Spivey can be reached at 908-707-3144 or mspivey@mycentraljersey.com.


Online story here. Archived here.

(Note: Online stories may be taken down by their publisher after a period of time or made available for a fee. Links posted here is from the original online publication of this piece.)

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff and Clippings have no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of these articles nor are Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff or Clippings endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Friday, July 11, 2008

Illegal immigrants - Courier - Bound Brook mulls refusing rental to illegals

Published in the Courier News July 7 thru July 9, 2008

(1) Monday, July 7, 2008

Councilman proposes ordinance
to halt renting to illegal immigrants in borough


By KARA L. RICHARDSON
STAFF WRITER


A proposal intended to crack down on illegal immigrants in the borough will be on the table at tonight's Borough Council meeting.

Councilman Jim Lefkowitz said he will introduce a resolution requiring landlords to verify their tenants are legal residents. The Borough Council meets at 7 p.m. in Borough Hall, 230 Hamilton St.

Lefkowitz's proposal comes four years after the U.S. Department of Justice cited borough officials for waging a multifaceted campaign to drive out Hispanics. Bound Brook, while not admitting guilt, agreed to settle the suit, paying a $30,000 fine and creating a $425,000 compensation fund for victims of discrimination between 1996 and 2002.

Lefkowitz alleged that since the U.S. Department of Justice citation, the borough has not enforced its own ordinances to prevent overcrowding. He said, "We're in danger of being considered a sanctuary (for illegal immigrants)."

Immigrant advocates have called proposals such as Lefkowitz's divisive, "wrong-headed" and "not the way to solve immigrant problems."

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed lawsuits challenging similar proposals adopted in a number of other municipalities across the country, including Hazleton, Pa., and the Burlington County community of Riverside. The Hazleton ordinance, which drew national attention, was overturned by a federal judge in 2007 while the Riverside law was repealed after a challenge was filed in court.

Lefkowitz said it's time for the borough to fight illegal immigration as there are several new housing projects on the horizon which might include several rental units, and he wanted to have new rules on the books before those units are occupied.

Lefkowitz's proposal also calls for police to determine the legal status of any person arrested and to make sure that if any illegal alien is taken into custody, that person is turned over to federal Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) officials. He has said that the proposal is consistent with current federal policy.

The proposal also calls for the borough to deny any contracts to a firm that hires illegal aliens.

"There's a ground swell of people willing to turn the other cheek on illegal immigration. I will not do it," Lefkowitz said.

Kara L. Richardson may be reached at (908) 707-3186 or krichardson@mycentraljersey.com
.

Online story here.



(2) Tuesday July 8, 2008

Proposal to crack down on illegal immigrants stalls
during Bound Brook council meeting


By KARA L. RICHARDSON
STAFF WRITER


A heated discussion ensued Tuesday night as the Borough Council was about to consider a proposal that would crack down on illegal immigrants.

Councilman Jim Lefkowitz's proposal, which would require landlords to obtain proof that tenants are legal residents, was introduced at Tuesday's meeting but did not move forward.

Mayor Carey Pilato, who said he's against the proposal, said the measure may bring additional legal fees and issues to the borough, which is still in the shadow of the U.S. Department of Justice investigation.

Lefkowitz's proposal comes four years after the U.S. Department of Justice cited borough officials for waging a multifaceted campaign to drive out Hispanics. Bound Brook, while not admitting guilt, agreed to settle the suit, paying a $30,000 fine and creating a $425,000 compensation fund for victims of discrimination between 1996 and 2002.

Linda Brnicevic, a Bound Brook resident, said Lefkowitz's proposal "is just going to be racial profiling." "I don't know when Bound Brook is going to learn,'" Brnicevic said. "You got slapped with the DOJ investigation. You had to take sensitivity classes, right?"

Lefkowitz, who said he embraces the Hispanic community in the borough, said his proposal is specific to illegal immigrants. He had said it's time for the borough to fight illegal immigration as there are several new housing projects on the horizon which may include several rental units, and he wanted to have new rules on books before they are occupied.

John Rucki, co-chair of New Jersey Citizens for Immigration Control, cited a 2007 The Federation for American Immigration Reform report saying illegal immigration costs New Jersey residents $2.1 billion in costs such as education, health care and incarceration.

"I admire Mr. Lefkowitz for his courage to bring it up,'" Rucki said.

Carmen Morales, a part-time realtor and full-time school bus driver, came to the meeting from Edison to commend Lefkowitz for his proposal.

Morales, who is a United States citizen of Puerto Rican descent, is against the living conditions for many illegal immigrants.

""People should not be living the way they are living. People are looking the other way and you are right on the money,'" Morales said to Lefkowitz.

Pilato said the borough already has a yearly inspection schedule for its 1,200-1,300 rental units, which make up approximately half of the borough's housing stock.

Grace C. Lemoke-Duebecke, a homeowner and landlord in Bound Brook, wanted to know how Lefkowitz expected landlords to check the legal status of a tenant.

"It's going to fall down on us,'" Lemoke-Duebecke said.

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed lawsuits challenging similar proposals adopted in a number of other municipalities across the country.

Lefkowitz's proposal also calls for police to determine the legal status of any person arrested and to make sure that if any illegal immigrant is taken into custody, that person is turned over to federal Immigration and Custom Enforcement officials. He has said that proposal is consistent with current federal policy.

The proposal also calls for the borough to deny any contracts to a firm that hires illegal immigrants.

Kara L. Richardson can be reached at (908) 707-3186 or krichardson@mycentraljersey.com
.

Online story here.



(3) Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Councilman aims to get illegal-immigrant
crackdown measure onto ballot


By KARA L. RICHARDSON
STAFF WRITER


Councilman Jim Lefkowitz wants to put on the November ballot his proposal to crack down on illegal immigrants in the borough.

Lefkowitz attempted to introduce a resolution with his proposal during Tuesday's borough council meeting, but none of his fellow council members made a motion that would have allowed its presentation discussion. The proposal would require landlords to obtain proof their tenants are legal residents, borough officials to deny contracts to firms that hire illegal immigrants and police to turn in to federal immigration authorities any illegal immigrants arrested in the borough.

"I can tell you this is not the end of this issue," Lefkowitz said at Tuesday's meeting. "I will do everything in my power to put this on the ballot in November as a nonbinding referendum."

Lefkowitz said he would hold a petition drive to do so.

To get a question on the ballot via petition, one would first need to obtain signatures from one-tenth of the voters registered for the last general election, Somerset County Clerk Brett Radi said. In Bound Brook's case, that would be 356 signatures.

If the issue is submitted via petition and presented to the municipality's governing body, it must be submitted to the county clerk's office by Sept. 5, Radi said.

Mayor Carey Pilato discouraged Lefkowitz from moving forward with the proposal. "Nobody seconded your resolution," Pilato said Tuesday night. You are on an island."

Pilato said the borough should not consider such an ordinance because the municipality is still in the shadow of the U.S. Department of Justice investigation that cited borough officials in 2004 for waging a multi-faceted campaign to drive out Hispanics.

Pilato said borough attorney James O'Donohue also advised against the proposal. O'Donohue could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Bound Brook admitted no guilt in the U.S. Department of Justice case, though officials agreed to pay a $30,000 fine and created a $425,000 compensation fund for victims of discrimination between 1996 and 2002. The borough also signed a consent decree that governs its policies on issues such as housing.

Lefkowitz stressed Tuesday night, in seeking support for his resolution, that the borough admitted no guilt in the U.S. Department of Justice case. He said the consent decree supports his proposal, because he believes his resolution would have prevented overcrowding in the borough's housing units.

Pilato said the borough also did not deny the U.S. Department of Justice's allegations. He said the borough strives to comply with the consent decree. At Tuesday's meeting, he held up an inch-thick quarterly report that must be filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. He also said the borough paid nearly $600,000 for one legal bill on that case.

Councilman Paul Hasting said some of the borough's existing ordinances could be tweaked to accomplish some of Lefkowitz's objectives.

Lefkowitz's proposal drew ire and commendation from the standing-room-only crowd Tuesday night in the council chambers.

John Rucki, co-chair of New Jersey Citizens for Immigration Control, came to the meeting to commend Lefkowitz for his courage to bring up the issue of illegal immigration, while resident Linda Brnicevic likened Lefkowitz's proposal to racial profiling.

Kara L. Richardson may be reached at (908) 707-3186 or krichardson@mycentraljersey.com
.

Online story here.


(Note: Online stories may be taken down by their publisher after a period of time or made available for a fee. Links posted here is from the original online publication of this piece.)

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff and Clippings have no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of these articles nor are Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff or Clippings endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Immigrants - Daily Record - Morristown considers deputizing police

Published in the Daily Record, Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Morristown Council considers Cresitello plan to deputize police

BY MINHAJ HASSAN
DAILY RECORD


MORRISTOWN -- Mayor Donald Cresitello and town council listened Tuesday night to nearly three hours of citizen testimony on his plan to deputize town police as federal immigration agents.

More than 200 people jammed the council chambers and spilled into the hallways, offering often strong opinions for and against the mayor's plan.

Bottom line: Cresitello is sticking by his guns and proceeding with the application to deputize the police in town.

After the hours of testimony, Cresitello said, "Don't tell me we don't need to enforce immigration laws. There are thousands of people crossing the line, who are criminals."

He also vowed that "we will never, ever profile."

The mayor said he had asked ministers to open churches to help mostly Hispanic day laborers who gather on town streets seeking work.

Takes on clerics

"Not one minister has done anything significant" to address stacking, prostitution, or slavery, he said. "But they'll put the basket out to take their money," the mayor said of the church collection plates.

In the past, police investigations on criminal aliens were hampered because local police did not have enough authority to go after them.

"We did not have the authority to intervene," the mayor said. "It made it look like we didn't care."

He said near his own home there were cases of money laundering, prostitution and slavery that involve illegal aliens.

Among those rising to speak was Ruby Winston of Hillairy Avenue. She said she backs the mayor's policy. "I'm with you 100 percent, you can count on that. I did office cleaning for 20 years and lost my job to the illegals," she told the mayor and council. She also said it's not true that Americans won't do jobs that immigrants will.

Outside support

Miguel Cruz of You Don't Speak for Me, an American-Hispanic organization opposed to illegal immigration said, "It is time to recognize the severe problem that it is."

"I had 17 people living across the street (in a single residence)," said Walker Avenue resident Jamie Ramsfelder. She said she couldn't walk in the area without some of those illegal aliens making inappropriate remarks.

She added that one of the illegal immigrants had urinated in the hedges, and another was so drunk he fell asleep in the bushes and almost froze to death.

Ramsfelder's husband, Jonathan, who also supports Cresitello's proposal, said, "The only thing I'm disappointed about is that it is not law yet."

Longtime resident Bob Tracy said "Thank God they gave us a young man who had the guts (to stand up to the illegal aliens problem)," referring to Cresitello. Tracy said he was "surprised and couldn't believe" there are were so many people in the council chambers "for illegality."

His remarks prompted applause.

Resident Ralph Bacharach said, "I think it's an opportunity for Morristown to take a leadership role."

While he respects hardworking immigrants who came to make a better life for themselves and their families, "that doesn't give them the right to break the laws of this community."

John A Rucki, co-chairman of the New Jersey Citizens for Immigration Control, based in Carlstadt, supported the policy. He said there are more than 600,000 illegal aliens who are either murderers or rapists, killed children or police officers in the nation.

He also blamed employers for exacerbating the problem.

"Those employers who aid or abet should get a "Go to Jail card," he said.
He pointed out that the deputization program does not enable police officers to conduct active sweeps. "That's part of the agreement."

On the other hand

Opponents of the mayor's deputization plan just about balanced the testimony supporting him.

Otto Maduro said "We will all pay very dearly if this policy is implemented. Hispanics are becoming the scapegoat."

Tom Clark-Shakir, an imam of The Islamic Clergyman Dedicated to the Leadership of W.D. Mohammed Ministry, "He's being influenced by small group of people who are turning him into a wicked man. It is a Gestapo tactic. Hitler started the same way."

Town resident David Silva said the program "is not a good measure for Morristown. I don't want to live in a place that's prejudiced."

He added that taking such a position ignores the positive contributions the immigrant community has made in Morristown.

Resident Tony Garcia said the program "directly targets the increasingly dominant Hispanic community and other minorities."

Intent of program

Town lawyers said the deputization program, formally known as 287-G, is intended for local law enforcement agencies to address the issue of criminal aliens.

Under the plan, up to 10 police officers would go through about five weeks of training from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that would enable them to enforce immigration laws.

Councilman Timothy Jackson asked whether the program would give police officers the ability to "supersede" probable cause when going after illegal immigrants.

The lawyers said no.

Councilman John Cryan asked that if a police officer stopped an illegal alien for jaywalking, could that officer then check their citizenship status.

Lawyers said that in theory, they could.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minhaj Hassan can be reached at (973) 267-9038 or mhassan@gannett.com.

THIRTY THREE COMMENTS

Reader Comment Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:21 pm
I have lived in the Dover area for 30 years now and have watched a once beautiful town turn dirty, grimy, and over crowded. I can only hope Dover adopts the same policy. I loath the part of my day when I have to drive thru Dover if it’s not a cab who cuts you off its someone jay walking right in the middle of rt. 46. And the cause of this is illegal immigrants. They come from 3rd world countries and bring there way of life here. All that garbage about how they do the job the Americans wont is a big fat lie. My brother who lives in L.A. is a painter who at one point made good money and employed legal Americans now has to work for less or lose his jobs because illegals will do it for cheaper. When I was in high school and college in the summer and some during the school year I did landscaping. That’s what young kids used to do. Now they can’t because of some illegal doing it cheaper. How many landscapers, dishwashers, cleaning people do we need? What do you do when all those jobs are filled?????? And I love the line America was built with immigrants so it should be today is garbage. Just cause something worked years ago doesn’t mean it will work today. That worked because people were needed. I don’t need 20 people wanting to mow my lawn I can do it myself. If you still believe illegal immigrants are doing such great things for our country take a walk in Morristown or Dover and can you really say that this place is better and safe? On every corner there is someone hanging out doing nothing. Don’t we have loitering laws? Who wants to see that? Please every town should have there officers do this!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a night Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:21 pm
I hope that the people of Morris County and The United States wake up. Last nights' display of support for Illegal Immigration was astounding. If this is not a call for action, I know not of any other. Over this past weekend the supporters actually flew Mexican flags at the rally. I didn't see any last night, but it wouldn't of surprised me. It's time to wake up Morris County. It is time to wake up America. Join with other like-minded citizens and cause change. Thank you Mayor. You are a true American. It is people such as yourself that are the catalyst for change.

Reader Comment Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:44 pm
SIMPLY PUT, WHAT THE MAYOR OF MORRISTOWN IS DOING BY WAY OF ADDING 'LIMITED INS ENFORCEMENT CAPABILITIES" TO THE MORRISTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT IS COMMENDABLE AND LONG OVER-DUE EVERYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

ALL MORRIS COUNTY AND FOR THAT MATTER ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY (AT THE MINIMUM) SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO QUALIFIED AS WELL!

THOSE INDIVIDUAL'S CLAIMING TO REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY HAVE THE MENDACITY TO ACCUSE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF BLATANT AND RACIST ACTIONS WHEN IT COMES TO ENFORCING THE LAWS "OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE" (AND BY THE WAY, "THE PEOPLE" ARE "THE CITIZENS" OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA).

WEBSTER'S NINETH NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY DEFINES THE WORD "ILLEGAL" AS, 1 : "NOT ACCORDING TO OR AUTHORIZED BY LAW", 2 : "AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT".

IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE PROTESTERS DELIBERATELY AND POSSIBLY FOR THEIR OWN SELF-INTEREST DO CONVENIENTLY IGNOR, FORGET, HIDE, DODGE, AND FOG THE FACT THAT "ILLEGAL" IS "ILLEGAL".

WEBSTER'S ALSO DEFINES THE WORD "RACISM" AS, "1 : A BELIEF THAT RACE IS THE PRIMARY DETERMINANT OF HUMAN TRAITS AND CAPACITIES AND THAT RACIAL DIFFERENCES PRODUCE AN INHERENT SUPERIORITY IN A PARTICULAR RACE 2 : RACIAL PREJUDICE OR DISCRIMINATION".

CLAIMS OF RACISM HAVE NO PART IN THE EQUATION OF "ENFORCING THE PEOPLES LAWS". THOSE THAT USE THE "RACE TRUMP CARD" DO SO FOR THEIR OWN MISGUIDED (OR MAYBE DELIBERATE) INFLAMATORY PURPOSES (MOST LIKELY FOR THE SELF-GRATIFICATION THEY FEEL WHEN THEY SEE THEIR PICTURE OR READ THEIR NAME AND COMMENTS IN THE NEWSPAPER OR BETTER YET ON THE TV NEWS BROADCAST COVERAGE OF THE "PROTESTS".

WHAT THE "RACE BAITER" DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT HIS OR HER VERY ACTIONS ARE AN EXPRESSION OF THEIR OWN PERSONAL RACISM.

FACT: THE MORRISTOWN POLICE ARE "OBLIGATED BY PERSONAL OATH" TO ENFORCE ALL LAWS WITHOUT REGARD TO RACE, AND THEREFORE, THE PROTESTS OF RACE DISCRIMINATION ARE NOT A FACTOR WHEN THE LAW(S) IS (ARE) BROKEN BY HUMAN BEINGS.

FACT: A HUMAN BEING ILLEGALLY ENTERING AND RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS AT THE END OF THE DAY, AND AFTER ALL THE DEBATE HAS ENDED, IS STILL RESIDING IN THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY.

THE "PEOPLE" HAVE EMPOWERED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO APPREHEND INDIVIDUALS ENTERING AND RESIDING IN OUR COUNTRY ILLEGALLY AND RETURN THEM TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.

IMMIGRANTS HAVE FOR CENTURIES LEGALLY ENTERED THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND MANY HAVE DECIDED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO BECOME A CITIZEN, LIVE HERE LEGALLY, AND RAISE A FAMILY OF NEW CITIZENS.

THEREFORE, ALLOWING ILLEGALS (OF ANY ETHNIC ORIGIN) TO ENTER AND RESIDE IN OUR COUNTRY DOES A GREAT DISSERVICE TO ALL THE IMMIGRANTS THAT FOLLOWED THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND EVENTUALLY BECAME A CITIZEN!!

SO DON'T FAULT THE "ELECTED" MAYOR OF MORRISTOWN FOR ENFORCING THE LAWS HE TOOK AN OATH OF OFFICE TO UPHOLD AND ENFORCE. AND WHEN ALL THE DUST HAS SETTLED REMEMBER THIS FACT: "ILLEGAL IS STILL ILLEGAL."

Mayor's initiative Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:20 pm
First of all, if people are really trying to make the case that this is not a racist initiative then calling all hispanic immigrant, legal or not, cockroaches isn't really going do it. It ridiculous to assume that all immigrants are rapist, theives, or murderers. There is good and bad in every group. Might I remind you of the KKK, the oklahoma city bombing, etc. There are also non-immigrant rapist, theives, and murderers. There are many immigrants that contribute to our community and our country and people that say that they are cockroaches set our country back to a time of pure racism and ideas of racial supremacy. I don't believe that all white people are racist. But the ones that make comments like those are the bad apples that make many people believe that all white people are racist.

Furthermore, the initiative that the mayor is trying to enact is meant to deport nondocumented immigrants that commit federal crimes. I don't see anything wrong with that part. BUT he keeps saying that he wants to use it to crack down on stacking and on the daylaborers that stand on street corners. So already he is planning on using the ICE initiative illegaly. I was at the coucil meeting last night. And as one of the residents that is in favor of mayor cresitelo's plan said, "two wrongs don't make a right"

Grammer & Spell Check Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:13 pm
Thank God we only have to learn the English language and not learn spelling or grammar. 90% of the posters here would be thrown out if that were the case.

Can we give an English test to the people born here too? Think of how many people we can get rid of with this one. I can see it now. Good vs. Well. Accept vs. Except. Either vs. Neither. Farther vs. Further. My favorite: Literally vs. Figuratively. We can nail 90% on that last one.

Real Americans, as these immigrants would know if they had made any attempts to assimilate, stay home and write to their congressman or yell things at the TV.

One more thing... We don't want your words (Spanish, German, Italian et cetera) to be used in OUR language. So take back kindergarten, faux pas, pro bono et cetera. Wait. I want aqua and ajar. Agua is fun to say, and my Japanese car announces the later each time I leave the door open when I drive.

Only the President has the right to break the law in the USA.

Reader Comment Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:51 pm
What is more disgusting then these dirtbag spanish illegal immigrants is the people that stick up for them! They receive all types of free goverment handouts.What about our people white americans that are here legally that cannot afford health care or feed their children.What about our seniors?They cant get welfare but these scum spanish do! They are NOT humans! They are uneducated pieces of crap!

emiral1126:
You said about 95 percent of the people in newark were asian and european well thats cause they have respect for America.They want a better life and are doing it the correct way.They dont get handouts,they don't sit around on welfare having 5-6 kids,they don't sell drugs to our children,they dont demand to have stuff writing intheir lanuage! The spanish illegals and legals want everything catered to them.

You go to walmart or sears and everything is writing in english and spanish ! That is plain bull crap. If they dont want to learn the lanugage then get the heck out! Even when you make phone calls press 1 for english or 2 for spanish! What give me a break.

Hate to say it but this is what you call "THE BROWNING OF AMERICA"!

If I went to Mexico or South America do you think I would be giving the same free handouts that they get here?Do you think they would put signs in English and Spanish? I think not.The majority of our prisions are spanish illegal immigrants. They are there for rape,murder,drugs,theft,gangs.
These dirtbags should be banned from breeding.
Go to the streets of Dover if your a female and tell me if you feel comfortable walking down the street by yourself!

ONE COUNTRY
ONE FLAG
ONE LANUAGE!!!!!!!!!


Link to online story.



(Note: Online stories may be taken down by their publisher after a period of time or made available for a fee. Links posted here is from the original online publication of this piece.)

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff and Clippings have no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of these articles nor are Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff or Clippings endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Thursday, June 07, 2007

Immigrants- NYTimes - Municipal IDs Issued to Illegals

Published in the New York Times, Tuesday, June 5, 2007

New Haven Approves Program to Issue Illegal Immigrants IDs

By JENNIFER MEDINA

NEW HAVEN, June 4 — The Board of Aldermen on Monday night made municipal identification cards available to illegal immigrants, in what city officials said was the first such program in the nation. The measure was approved by a vote of 25 to 1.

City officials and immigrant rights advocates said they hoped the cards would give immigrants better access to city services and help the police confirm their identities should they become targets of crime. Last year, a number of illegal immigrants told community service agencies they had been robbed of cash, but said they were worried about telling the authorities for fear of being deported.

The cards, which will include an official photograph and city imprint, will be available to all residents, regardless of immigration status, and the city is placing special emphasis on issuing them to children, college students and people 65 and older, as well as immigrants without green cards. Immigrant rights advocates and city officials began developing plans for the card last year, and New Haven planned to begin issuing them in July.

In an effort to attract residents to the program, the city is placing a magnetic strip on the back of the cards, which, when swiped, would deduct money from a prepaid account to pay for parking at meters, as well as goods at about 50 restaurants and stores in New Haven.

“The last thing we want is to create what will be an easy giveaway about who amongst us has status and who doesn’t,” said Kica Matos, the community affairs director for the city, who spearheaded the effort. “So we had to make sure that we have a card that has wide appeal.”

While the cards have provoked outrage from anti-immigrant groups around the state, few in New Haven have voiced concern. The program has received national attention, and Ms. Matos said lawmakers from New York City and Dutchess County, N.Y., have contacted her about setting up similar programs.

Permalink to online story.

(Note: Online stories may be taken down by their publisher after a period of time or made available for a fee. Links posted here is from the original online publication of this piece.)

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff and Clippings have no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of these articles nor are Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff or Clippings endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

About Me

Plainfield resident since 1983. Retired as the city's Public Information Officer in 2006; prior to that Community Programs Coordinator for the Plainfield Public Library. Founding member and past president of: Faith, Bricks & Mortar; Residents Supporting Victorian Plainfield; and PCO (the outreach nonprofit of Grace Episcopal Church). Supporter of the Library, Symphony and Historic Society as well as other community groups, and active in Democratic politics.