Immigratrion - NY Times - OpEd: On Schwarzenegger's innovative plan

*
Published in the New York Times, Monday, July 31, 2006

Op-Ed Contributor
Splitting the Difference at the Border

By JILL STEWART

Sacramento

AS a decidedly non-mainstream Republican in a decidedly Democratic state, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California has had to walk a tightrope, and he’s slipped more than once. But on a tricky issue that’s confounding both parties, he has managed to find a clever third way: The immigrant from Austria who made good is pursuing a pragmatic approach to illegal immigration that warring elements in Washington might do well to emulate.

Facing re-election in November and bolstered by newly rosy poll numbers, Mr. Schwarzenegger is shaping a policy that audaciously sticks a foot in both the anti-illegal immigrant and pro-illegal immigrant camps. His dizzyingly mixed viewpoints, which generate headlines in California, make the recent Congressional hearings on illegal immigration — which he dismissed as “a road show” — look even more contrived by comparison.

Mr. Schwarzenegger’s views might best be described as tough on security with dollops of humanity. For example, he persuaded the Legislature to repeal a law that would have given driver’s licenses to illegal aliens without a background check — which gave rise to legitimate concerns about terrorists getting ID’s — but has since left the door open to signing such a law if better security safeguards are included.

Likewise, he reluctantly agreed in early June to send 1,000 members of the California National Guard to the Mexican border, but refused a request later that month from President Bush to send 1,500 guardsmen to other states. Unhappy with slow progress by the Bush administration on immigration reform, he is maintaining pressure by saying he won’t keep the guard at the California-Mexico border after 2008.

The governor has also split the baby on social services. He insists that “every child, if they are here legally or illegally” must get schooling and health care — and has poured vast sums into both this year. Yet he defied California’s liberal Legislature on a plan to spend hundreds of millions of additional dollars on a statewide subsidized health care program known as Healthy Families that is used by many illegal immigrants.

Recently, Mr. Schwarzenegger has added Arnoldo Torres to his campaign team as Latino voter- outreach guru. Mr. Torres, a Democrat and former political commentator for Univision, the Spanish-language TV network, played a key role in President Ronald Reagan’s 1986 liberalization of immigration laws (which he now says was a flop).

Mr. Torres was a canny hire because he has credibility among a wide swath of Mexican-Americans and immigration advocates but he isn’t tied down to the traditional pro-immigration cant. For example, he says that Mexico’s listless political and business classes should stop wallowing in the past and start creating jobs — a politically incorrect view that is rarely uttered by Latino leaders in the United States.

Now, with his re-election campaign against the Democratic state treasurer, Phil Angelides, heating up, Mr. Schwarzenegger generated headlines by expressing regret over his previous praise for the Minutemen border patrols and by telling a Spanish-language newspaper he was “wrong” in 1994 for backing Proposition 187 (the measure approved by California voters but overturned by the courts that would have banned illegal immigrants from receiving welfare, college tuition subsidies and other benefits). Defending his change of heart, Mr. Schwarzenegger said it was better to admit he’d been mistaken than to act as if he’d been right.

This sort of pragmatism eluded the governor’s predecessors, Pete Wilson and Gray Davis, whose careers foundered in part on the issue of illegal immigration. Mr. Wilson, a moderate Republican, sided with his party’s conservative wing on Proposition 187 and was forever (unfairly) painted by the press as anti-immigrant. Mr. Davis, a moderate Democrat, sided with his party’s left wing in signing the law giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. That signature helped ensure his recall from office.

Over lunch recently, Mr. Schwarzenegger told me he was “fed up” with the warring in Congress and believed that Americans would grow more divided if immigration reform wasn’t approved this year. He said he backed the basic idea of a guest worker plan and a pathway to citizenship, but took a dim view of letting millions of illegal immigrants go to the front of the line while law-abiding foreigners in desperately poor countries spend years awaiting entry.

While he would not delineate what he thought Washington should do, a few steps suggest themselves. The House Republicans, for example, might rebuke the vigilantist tendencies of the Minutemen, which would make it harder for their opponents to brand them as heartless.

Senate Republicans might get past all the questions over the “fairness” of their softer approach by showing some of the governor’s practicality and explaining precisely how all the law-abiding foreigners who have waited years for admission to the United States are going to be kept at the “front” of the line if more than 11 million illegal immigrants have already cut into the queue.

Congressional Democrats, for their part, might take note of the governor’s success at drawing a line between paying for essential needs of immigrant children and providing broader entitlements that simply lead to more illegal immigration.

In pursuing a mixed ideology based on pragmatism and an underlying commonality, Arnold Schwarzenegger may be showing Congress, the White House and the nation a way out of the current morass.

Jill Stewart writes a syndicated column on California politics.

Link to online story.

(Note: Online stories may be taken down by their publisher after a period of time or made available for a fee. Links posted here is from the original online publication of this piece.)

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff and Clippings have no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of these articles nor are Plainfield Today, Plainfield Stuff or Clippings endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
*